You must log in to edit PetroWiki. Help with editing
Content of PetroWiki is intended for personal use only and to supplement, not replace, engineering judgment. SPE disclaims any and all liability for your use of such content. More information
Design for decommissioning: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Draft Index for review by the Joint Industry project.& | <p>Draft Index for review by the Joint Industry project.  The final page will be completed soon with many additions | ||
</p><p>1 Statement of objectives | |||
1 Statement of objectives | </p><p>The D4D Database provides feedback from late life and abandonment operations.  It provides practical guidance to engineers when designing new facilities or modifying existing facilities | ||
</p><p>The challenges and issues encountered at the end of a facility's life may not be foreseen or correctly considered during the design phase. This lack of attention can make the eventual decommissioning work more technically challenging and costly.  The purpose of the database is to identify decommissioning issues based on real industry lessons learnt and translate these into potential solutions which could be implemented in future designs | |||
The D4D Database provides feedback from late life and abandonment operations.& | </p><p>2 History of JIP | ||
</p><p>Work group: formed in Aug 2016 with thirteen organisations | |||
The challenges and issues encountered at the end of a facility's life may not be foreseen or correctly considered during the design phase. This lack of attention can make the eventual decommissioning work more technically challenging and costly.& | </p><p>Initial project scope: boundaries identified – i.e. subsea only | ||
</p><p>Demonstrated economic value: examined the influence of decommissioning costs in the whole asset lifecycle | |||
2 History of JIP | </p><p>Structure for database: defined for use by Lead Design Engineers | ||
</p><p>Database populated: input from decommissioning community | |||
Work group: formed in Aug 2016 with thirteen organisations | </p><p>Industry guidelines: started preparation to integrate findings and recommendations into the conceptual and FEED phases of the lifecycle | ||
</p><p>3 Decommissioning cost matrix | |||
Initial project scope: boundaries identified – i.e. subsea only | </p><p> | ||
</p><p> | |||
Demonstrated economic value: examined the influence of decommissioning costs in the whole asset lifecycle | </p><p>4 When to incorporate decommissioning in design | ||
</p><p>5 Database of lessons learnt and design guidance | |||
Structure for database: defined for use by Lead Design Engineers | </p><p>6 Economic Benefits | ||
</p><p>7 Contacts  Stuart.Martin@ardent.com, Caroline.Laurenson@xodus.com, Alan.Stokes@advisian.com | |||
Database populated: input from decommissioning community | </p> | ||
Industry guidelines: started preparation to integrate findings and recommendations into the conceptual and FEED phases of the lifecycle | |||
3 Decommissioning cost matrix | |||
4 When to incorporate decommissioning in design | |||
5 Database of lessons learnt and design guidance | |||
6 Economic Benefits | |||
7 Contacts& |
Revision as of 04:27, 4 September 2017
Draft Index for review by the Joint Industry project. The final page will be completed soon with many additions
1 Statement of objectives
The D4D Database provides feedback from late life and abandonment operations. It provides practical guidance to engineers when designing new facilities or modifying existing facilities
The challenges and issues encountered at the end of a facility's life may not be foreseen or correctly considered during the design phase. This lack of attention can make the eventual decommissioning work more technically challenging and costly. The purpose of the database is to identify decommissioning issues based on real industry lessons learnt and translate these into potential solutions which could be implemented in future designs
2 History of JIP
Work group: formed in Aug 2016 with thirteen organisations
Initial project scope: boundaries identified – i.e. subsea only
Demonstrated economic value: examined the influence of decommissioning costs in the whole asset lifecycle
Structure for database: defined for use by Lead Design Engineers
Database populated: input from decommissioning community
Industry guidelines: started preparation to integrate findings and recommendations into the conceptual and FEED phases of the lifecycle
3 Decommissioning cost matrix
4 When to incorporate decommissioning in design
5 Database of lessons learnt and design guidance
6 Economic Benefits
7 Contacts Stuart.Martin@ardent.com, Caroline.Laurenson@xodus.com, Alan.Stokes@advisian.com